RX8 beat Murcielago, 360 Modena & M3!!!!!

[Ramsie]

wow... more power per liter....


and the car is still gay

[JohnnyWash1]

Originally Posted by shaggy

how many liters is a 302 Mustang 87-93

Interestingly enough, it's actually a 4.9 Liter. Ford rounded up for some unknown reason (sounds better). As for the rotary math, NoHook is absolutely right.




Jon

[r34drifter]

He's telling the truth guys Here's the specs on each car. Look down at HP/Liter
2005 Mustang GT
2001 360 Modena
2003 BMW M3 CSL
2003 Lamborghini Gallardo
2004 Lamborghini Murcielago
2002 Mazda RX-8

But Guess what, here's the ultimate winner, This RX7 produces 211hp/liter Wow!
2000 Mazda RX-7 Type RZ

[NoHook]

Originally Posted by r34drifter

He's telling the truth guys Here's the specs on each car. Look down at HP/Liter
2005 Mustang GT
2001 360 Modena
2003 BMW M3 CSL
2003 Lamborghini Gallardo
2004 Lamborghini Murcielago
2002 Mazda RX8

OMG yes he is telling the truth about the HP per liter on the other cars, However THE RX_8 IS NOT 1.3 ****IN LITERS IT IS 2.6 . The RX-7 isn't 1.3 liter either, their Math is ****ed up and I am not gonna explain it again, read the whole post lol

[r34drifter]

Originally Posted by NoHook

OMG yes he is telling the truth about the HP per liter on the other cars, However THE RX_8 IS NOT 1.3 ****IN LITERS IT IS 2.6 .

sorry dude, but you can click on the link again, look on displacement and it says 1300cc (don't click on your reply rx8 link, it doesn't work. click on my reply's link)

[NoHook]

Originally Posted by r34drifter

sorry dude, but you can click on the link again and it says 1300cc clearly

Yeah, and they are wrong. They figure that since only 1 rotor is producing power at a time and since that rotor area is 1.3 liters they can call it a 1.3 liter. But in actuality a 2 rotor is a 2.6 liter and a 3 rotor is a 3.9 liter. Don't you think it is funny how a 2 rotor and a 3 rotor motor can both be 1.3 liters I mean the 3 rotor has a whole nother rotor and is 50% bigger. Their math is ****ed up, if we went by there math we would figure our cars are 2.5 liters for a 5.0 mustang because only half of the pistons fire at once You are wrong and so is the company for saying their car is 1.3 liters GODDAMNIT !!!! I AM GONNA ****IN BOMB MAZDA lol

[r34drifter]

Originally Posted by NoHook

Yeah, and they are wrong. They figure that since only 1 rotor is producing power at a time and since that rotor area is 1.3 liters they can call it a 1.3 liter. But in actuality a 2 rotor is a 2.6 liter and a 3 rotor is a 3.9 liter. Don't you think it is funny how a 2 rotor and a 3 rotor motor can both be 1.3 liters I mean the 3 rotor has a whole nother rotor and is 50% bigger. Their math is ****ed up, if we went by there math we would figure our cars are 2.5 liters for a 5.0 mustang because only half of the pistons fire at once You are wrong and so is the company for saying their car is 1.3 liters GODDAMNIT !!!! I AM GONNA ****IN BOMB MAZDA lol

OK, you get the last word...
Thread Closed!!!

[NoHook]

Originally Posted by r34drifter

OK, you get the last word...
Thread Closed!!!

OK thanks

[Bloody Fork]

Thread Open Bwhahahahahahhahahahaha

[NoHook]

Originally Posted by Bloody Fork

Thread Open Bwhahahahahahhahahahaha

heh I like this guy

[Haakon]

iff you like american v8's

[Blackmilk]

Originally Posted by r34drifter

He's telling the truth guys Here's the specs on each car. Look down at HP/Liter
2005 Mustang GT
2001 360 Modena
2003 BMW M3 CSL
2003 Lamborghini Gallardo
2004 Lamborghini Murcielago
2002 Mazda RX-8

But Guess what, here's the ultimate winner, This RX7 produces 211hp/liter Wow!
2000 Mazda RX-7 Type RZ

Best engine build in factory with 125.19 bhp per litre : S2000

http://www.supercars.net/cars/2000@$Honda@$S2000g.html

[nighthound]

Originally Posted by NoHook

Yeah, and they are wrong. They figure that since only 1 rotor is producing power at a time and since that rotor area is 1.3 liters they can call it a 1.3 liter. But in actuality a 2 rotor is a 2.6 liter and a 3 rotor is a 3.9 liter. Don't you think it is funny how a 2 rotor and a 3 rotor motor can both be 1.3 liters I mean the 3 rotor has a whole nother rotor and is 50% bigger. Their math is ****ed up, if we went by there math we would figure our cars are 2.5 liters for a 5.0 mustang because only half of the pistons fire at once You are wrong and so is the company for saying their car is 1.3 liters GODDAMNIT !!!! I AM GONNA ****IN BOMB MAZDA lol

a 3 rotor is a 20b.

20b = 2.0 liters. not 1.3 liter for the 20b 3 rotor motor.

i didn't check out all the cars in that link except for the rx-7 and rx-8... so if i'm way off topic and thats not what you meant, ignore this.

[r34drifter]

Originally Posted by Boyd

Best engine build in factory with 125.19 bhp per litre : S2000

http://www.supercars.net/cars/2000@$Honda@$S2000g.html

That's like 60 percent the power of a rotary

[JohnnyWash1]

Eh, R34 is just trying to be a prick. Including a Turbocharged Rotary in a specific output battle is like letting men compete in women's olympics.



Jon