Fast and the Furious/ 2 fast 2 furious- starting major crap thread

[BlackXJ96]

Originally Posted by Squeedlyspooch

yea i see alot of cars that drive around with bodykits that are not even painted,,,,,,,does any one see any primer civics wit daul APC exhaust its so retarded ,,,,,i drive two import cars but im not a ricer,,,its gotta be done rite guys,,ill post up pics soon of my cars,,it just i been really busy sit school

What's with all the commas?

I read about the Yenko 454 Nova and they were saying that thing was so fast and put down so much torque that if you stomped on it too hard, even while rolling, it tried to swap ends... Don Tenko built a lot of cars (not high volume by any means) ranging from Novas, to Camaros, Chevelles, and even Vega station wagons...He started out as nothing more than a PA Chevy dealer who wanted to add a little incentive to shop his dealership.

[Ace]

i cant remember which one its from....but Paul walker jumps a freakin bridge and gets no scratches on the car ! i mean make it realistic ...those movies sucked and ruined street racing and ****...hopefully they dont make one on drifting !

fast and the furious = :loser1:

[Traction Issuez]

first off to correct a few of you, it was a 68 charger, second, it was a fake blower on it in the crash,not the same car, i doubt it was a real yenko and if it was, it would of been a prop if it was wrecked,

[bmxer99]

Originally Posted by bmxer8699

on hbo they had a special on the making of the movie and they did just place the car perfectly onto the boat, it wasnt scratched even a bit, all the damage that is done is computer generated.

read^^^ and yes all the cars were real

[Traction Issuez]

Originally Posted by Traction Issuez

first off to correct a few of you, it was a 68 charger, second, it was a fake blower on it in the crash,not the same car, i doubt it was a real yenko and if it was, it would of been a prop if it was wrecked,

^^read^^

[Eddy_Wu]

i like more the first 1 the 2nd they just mess it up for me

[DarkSide]

the bridge crap was retarded, the muscle cars were not real (the hero cars were, not the stunt cars)

[BlackXJ96]

Originally Posted by Traction Issuez

first off to correct a few of you, it was a 68 charger, second, it was a fake blower on it in the crash,not the same car, i doubt it was a real yenko and if it was, it would of been a prop if it was wrecked,

Given the rarity and value of a real one, I'd agree that the one used was a fake. Besides I'd hope they wouldn't subject a real to being in that movie...

[robz95xj]

Originally Posted by Traction Issuez

first off to correct a few of you, it was a 68 charger, wrecked,

It was a 70. The 68's didnt have those tail lights

[robz95xj]

68 Charger


70 Charger

[DarkSide]

thank you rob. btw, i much prefer the '68 rear. while the '70 is more subdued and aggressive, the '68 is just classic

[robz95xj]

Originally Posted by DarkSide

thank you rob. btw, i much prefer the '68 rear. while the '70 is more subdued and aggressive, the '68 is just classic

I like the 68's. Everyone has a 69 or wants one.

[DarkSide]

Originally Posted by ROBZ95XJ

I like the 68's. Everyone has a 69 or wants one.

'68 was a great year for muscle cars. and it kinda gets overlooked between '67 and '69

[robz95xj]

Originally Posted by DarkSide

'68 was a great year for muscle cars. and it kinda gets overlooked between '67 and '69

70 was agreat year for the pony cars with the 'Cuda and Challenger being introdused

[Traction Issuez]

well it just goes to show how much i payed attention to the movie, i guess i'm getting my movies mixed up. i remember the charger having the 68 rear end.

and like blackxj said, why would any owner put his rare car{yenko} in a ricer gone wild movie, if it was a real yenko he should be beaten for his act of retardedness.