3000gt v vr4 Vs. 07 mustang gt

[Memphis]

What is this ********* switch . Anyway onto the vid, sonned. Whats it run mid-high 12's? I saw in the photobucket the LS1 keeping up with it a lil.

[05BLKSTANG]

97talon;
1st- I was not making fun of Quibrons car, just his statement about running with 0 PSI and running with Stangs.
2nd- In regards to making fun of EH! ride, coming from a guy who drives that truck and referancing an 07 Mustang GT as a POS thats hillarious
3rd- I personally don't like the GM nuthuggers on this forum, but you don't see me taking out my anger with there sh*t on there rides, because GM makes good cars, I like the company.
3rd- I'm not trying to make friends, I know who the as*holes are and aren't.
4th- When I refer to "ricers" it's there performance statements, not vechile body kits I refer to. Some people like to make fun of import guys because of there body kits. The "body kit" I put on my ride was a classic ducktail spoiler and blacking out the side windows. Far from rice in anyones defination.
5th- I don't know why you were so insulted with the GTR thread, I think it went well for once. No sh*t talking straight facts, and I actually learned something about cars governed at 180kph in Japan.

Lastly, word of advice, be the bigger guy when arguing you'll get more respect from everyone.

88ford,
I now a guy who's a friend of a friend who's been gunning for me with his 05 cobalt ss supercharged. He has pulley, intake and slicks at the track.
I've run him, he's NEVER run a faster time or mph (expect the very rare time I missed a gear). He's the last GM nuthugger on my hit list over here thats going to get pay back this year.
The guy comes to the track, doesn't do what he says he can do, see's my results, comes back to the track "alone" and apprently runs faster than me.
Says he has a vid of it. To date have request vid but not shown.
Then gets called out to go to the track, but doesn't want to go.
I haven't forgotten, and this year when we go after I lay an a*swhipping on him, and then call him the ricer he is.
All I'm saying don't always believe what you here.

Originally Posted by 97talon

Ohhh, where to start???

To 05Blkstang:

First, you really shouldn't try to make fun of people's cars without actually knowing about them (go check out the thread on quibron's 0psi rs). Second I don't talk crap about any v8's, just certain ones . I have never said anything bad about members cars on here who have v8's (except rams, and that's just because it's an auto and ford88 just because it's a vert). Just because I give people a hard time doesn't mean I don't like there car. And if you are going to try to quote me make sure you get it right. I didn't say that the new corvette was the best thing from chevy since 1953. I said "Let the nuthuggers go. They are finally happy that after 53 years of development chevy made something that can actually go fast." The only reason for that comment was the insistent flaming of the new gtr that was being done by certain people (you bastards know who you are ). And going after my manhood because I can't "role" with you hahahahahahahahahahahaha. In case you haven't noticed I never come on here bragging about races or anything. I come here to watch vids and have a good time. Starting shit just happens to be fun most of the time. I respect everyone on here's car (even those I give a hard time) except yours now. You are the one who paid 38K for a mustang.... And did body mods before performance mods. Doesn't that make you a ricer?

To Ford88:

When was the last time I honestly gave you a hard time? The only thing I say now is the occasional "**** verts" comment lol. I used to give you a hard time because you were easy to get going. But now you are actually trying with your car so you have earned some respect.
And stock boost for skittles is 14.2 psi. As far as cars that beat me, I know NA hondas that rape me. There will always be a car faster than me and I know that. I only turn on the ******* switch when someone starts it first.

[05BLKSTANG]

Forgot to answer this statement you made.
In 05 (when I bought the car) all I did was axle back flowmasters
In 06 Intake, tune, pulley, hurst shifter, pro kit springs
In 07 Headers, hi flows delete plates
Nothing left to do except for charger/ turbo, holding off till car is paid off.
Someone hit my rear bumper in 06 so when I got it re-painted in 07 a put on the new spoiler and side scoops, why not paint is already there.
My defination of ricer is not there vechile, just the BS times, mph there car can do, when it can't.

[quote=97talon;426493]Ohhh, where to start???

To 05Blkstang:

And did body mods before performance mods. Doesn't that make you a ricer?

QUOTE]

[Ford88]

Originally Posted by 05BLKSTANG

Nothing left to do except for charger/ turbo, holding off till car is paid off.

Nothing left to do besides supercharger or turbo... Lets see here, gears, heads, cams, upper/lower control arms, nitrous, new tune for your headers, better rims and tires for more traction... list goes on, and you still fail.

[Quibron]

To 05BLKSTANG

Wow, you got some balls to post comments like you do when you never bothered to look at the car you were talking sh** about. Other than my intercooler, everything on my car is as stock as the day I rolled it off the dealership floor. And to find out that you have gone by the theory of " if it looks fast it must be fast" thats just crazy.

Lets say for instance you pay your car off,dump 15 to 18 thousand dollars into the motor and drive train, drive from point A to point B, and somewhere in the middle of those two someone in a stock Mustang with flowmasters on it wants to race. How much boost do you think you would use to stay just a car ahead of him?
(Not trying to start a fight, just sticking up for my comment, and by the way when you have a somewhat large turbo 0 psi helps out a lot more than you would think)
Something makes me want to ask the question that if this thread was about a 3000gt and a camaro we wouldn't be having this discussion .

To Ford88

I've never seen you giving anyone a hard time on here so take this with a grain of salt. Before you give 97Talon a hard time, the amount of power you make with a turbo is only half decided by the psi, the other half is up to the size of the turbo. My RS is set up for 15 psi and makes about 400 or so horses, My wrx with a 2.0 and a much smaller turbo @ around 14.5 psi makes 227, Skittles with a 2.2 and a different size turbo makes almost the same as the wrx.
As far as the 14 to 18 psi not being a lot, I don't think so. Take my t60 on the RS and crank that fuc*er up to 20 or 25 psi, THATS A LOT OF BOOST.

[05BLKSTANG]

Actually forgot to mention, last year a put in a 4.10 gear
For me, nitrous is a waste of money. Yah when you spray a 100 shot the car moves but when your out of NOS, refilling the bottle, thats just not appealing to me.
Heads & Cams are also a waste of money in my opinion. A little more money and you can get a KB/ charger on it, not to mention to get big power with the head & cam package, your car no longer meets emission standards (get pulled over your screwed, over here in Toronto when your car reaches 4 years or older you have to do an emission test every 2 years, therefore have to grease a shady mechanic $400 to pass it), and you drop 30 to 40% gas milage.
I didn't buy the Stang for milage, but it still has to be somewhat reasonable.
Gas at $1.00/ litre = $60.00 fill up @ 420 km (260 mi) per tan, which includes alot of fun and 80% city, 20 highway with all the mods above.
Gas by this summer will be $1.30/ litre for 94 oct.
Head & Cam in my opinion is good for track only applications
However with a charger in normal use (2500- 3500 RPM) you actually pick up milage and the system meets emission standards.
Cosmetic, tires rims thats for later, and lastly,
Where did I fail? Don't understand that comment.

Originally Posted by Ford88

Nothing left to do besides supercharger or turbo... Lets see here, gears, heads, cams, upper/lower control arms, nitrous, new tune for your headers, better rims and tires for more traction... list goes on, and you still fail.

[05BLKSTANG]

Listen, I did SAY your car was shit. I had a problem with your 0 PSI statement. Go re-read the TREAD.
Next the Stang in this vid got smoked period. Never said the Stang was faster cause it's a Stang. Your reading into things that are NOT there.
Now if I had a charger on it and ran into a guy with a STOCK Stang I'd need about 2LBS on the STANG. 4LBs on the 05's are making 400 flywheel HP, and you have to subtract the charger losses.
Yes your correct if this thread was about a 3000gt & Camaro we wouldn't be having this discussion because, I DON'T LIKE THE GM NUTHUGGERS.
When some gets pissed off at them, they have it coming.
If it were on another site where these guys were decent, we WOULD BE having this arguement, cause I'm also a GM fan.

Originally Posted by Quibron

To 05BLKSTANG

Wow, you got some balls to post comments like you do when you never bothered to look at the car you were talking sh** about. Other than my intercooler, everything on my car is as stock as the day I rolled it off the dealership floor. And to find out that you have gone by the theory of " if it looks fast it must be fast" thats just crazy.

Lets say for instance you pay your car off,dump 15 to 18 thousand dollars into the motor and drive train, drive from point A to point B, and somewhere in the middle of those two someone in a stock Mustang with flowmasters on it wants to race. How much boost do you think you would use to stay just a car ahead of him?
(Not trying to start a fight, just sticking up for my comment, and by the way when you have a somewhat large turbo 0 psi helps out a lot more than you would think)
Something makes me want to ask the question that if this thread was about a 3000gt and a camaro we wouldn't be having this discussion .

To Ford88

I've never seen you giving anyone a hard time on here so take this with a grain of salt. Before you give 97Talon a hard time, the amount of power you make with a turbo is only half decided by the psi, the other half is up to the size of the turbo. My RS is set up for 15 psi and makes about 400 or so horses, My wrx with a 2.0 and a much smaller turbo @ around 14.5 psi makes 227, Skittles with a 2.2 and a different size turbo makes almost the same as the wrx.
As far as the 14 to 18 psi not being a lot, I don't think so. Take my t60 on the RS and crank that fuc*er up to 20 or 25 psi, THATS A LOT OF BOOST.

[05BLKSTANG]

Sorry meant to say " DIDN'T SAY YOUR CAR WAS SHIT"

[Memphis]

You really are taking this too hard lol

[Soup]

So the moral of this story is that 05+ mustangs suck right?

[Quibron]

Originally Posted by 05BLKSTANG

Listen, I did SAY your car was shit. I had a problem with your 0 PSI statement. Go re-read the TREAD.
Next the Stang in this vid got smoked period. Never said the Stang was faster cause it's a Stang. Your reading into things that are NOT there.
Now if I had a charger on it and ran into a guy with a STOCK Stang I'd need about 2LBS on the STANG. 4LBs on the 05's are making 400 flywheel HP, and you have to subtract the charger losses.
Yes your correct if this thread was about a 3000gt & Camaro we wouldn't be having this discussion because, I DON'T LIKE THE GM NUTHUGGERS.
When some gets pissed off at them, they have it coming.
If it were on another site where these guys were decent, we WOULD BE having this arguement, cause I'm also a GM fan.

And how much do those 05 mustangs weigh? Don't forget about power to weight ratio. If you added even 500 lb to my car it would be slow as shit (Just like a Mustang)

[97talon]

It would take more than 500 lbs...

[05BLKSTANG]

Coming from a person like you, that really means something.
Enjoy talking, cause you'll never have anything.

Originally Posted by Soup

So the moral of this story is that 05+ mustangs suck right?

[Blair_355]

lol wanker.

[05BLKSTANG]

Since you want to compare your 07 Sti to my stang,

1st- Hope we meet up one day and line up.
My 05 Stang will out accelerate your STi in the quater with a higher mph.
To make it very close, you'll have to dump your car at 6000rpm.
05 stang, carries 300lbs more than yours, 5 speed and gets a better epa and costs 7k USD less.
2nd- Power to weight, hp per litre are all tools used to mislead the average consumer.
Yes the lighter car has an advantage, but when your talking about 320 ft lbs at 2200 RPM a way higher average HP throughout the RPM spectrum 300 lbs isn't that much.
The Stang is actually the lightest muscle car out there. Lighter than the last gen Camaro, 2008 Dodge Challenger & most likely future Camaro
3rd- By your post below, it's odvious you don't know much.

People like you boggle my mind. Toyota, Nissan after 50 years in the game are now making V8's. Why?
3550 lbs sounds alot for a rear-wheel (almost full frame) muscle car, who's 8.8in 31 spline diff can handle 1000whp? All, musclecars, stock from factory come with serious hardware for racing.
Check out what Leno says about them.
Now if your into rallying, off roading or just want a nice all round car, an Sti is a good choice, but make no mistake the Stang isn't slow and will bring an a*swhopping to your doors.

Originally Posted by Quibron

And how much do those 05 mustangs weigh? Don't forget about power to weight ratio. If you added even 500 lb to my car it would be slow as shit (Just like a Mustang)