![]() |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Well, I think it's pretty obvious the Cobra had an advantage. It weighs waaaaaay less than the CL and was also modified. V-12, bi-turbo or not, is how it came from the factory. The next car on the Cobra's list to race should be the SL65 bi-turbo which weighs less (than the CL) and should give the Cobra a lot better run for its money. A few threads down you'll see a video of a modded Cobra vs. an E55. It should give you an idea of what a Merc is capable of stock out of the factory. Take this and multiply it by 1.5 and you'll understand what the SL65 will be able to do. At the very least it is lightyears ahead of any Ford in handling and general performance (keep in mind that I have plenty of respect for Cobras, but not much else in the Ford line-up including the new GT40). My final thoughts are keep it German, smoke everything else in style, luxury and refinement.
__________________
The FASTLANE is for FAST CARS, damnit!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Well, when you have 700+ ft-Lbs of torque at around 2000 RPM all the way up, does the weight REALY matter?
BTW SL doesn't weigh allot less then a CL. About your last thoughts, well you should consider price !!! I BET the cobra stops, and has better lateral GRIP, than the MBZ ! Handling??? when was the last time you drove a MBZ >? they are supple, and refined, yes, but not performance oriented ! they roll and dive too much, specially with the Airmatic DC. BMW are different, they usually handle well, and are definitely performance oriented. FORD GT = LEGEND, no need for any other comment ! We’ll see who is talking about the CL65 - 40 years from now ! Jeremy Clarkson, who is EXTREEMLY biased against anything German, dumped his Ferrari for an SL55, what does that tell you about the MBZ, must be a nice car then ???? well he just dumped the SL for a Ford GT. In his review he said that he got the photographer to drive it so he can admire its behind ! ![]()
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Fresh Noob
|
Quote:
BTW I think the SL weighs more than the CL, and the only difference between the two is handling. I am a huge fan of both Ford and MB and I just thought this was a good vid. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
My point is this: Sure, with the money I could spend on a SL65, I could build 10 different cars (i.e. hondas with type R swaps, GTIs with turbos, big block domestics) that would smoke both cars in that video. The bottomline is that you can't dis an SL by saying it's not a performance vehicle. I didn't say that Cobras were slow (we all know they're not). I understand the ridiculous margin between the prices of both cars. My response was from a strictly performance point of view.
__________________
The FASTLANE is for FAST CARS, damnit!! Last edited by 24VR666; 25 Dec 2004 at 10:46 am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
OK heres some facts for ya my friend, when i said performance oriented i ment the handling. In a straight line i have to hand it to MBZ as a stock car, there insane ! I drove more than my fair share of MBZ's but i didnt have the opportunity to drive a Cobra, hence ill take your word for it, i deffinetly agree on the handling of the cobra, never the less i think if you take both to a track the Cobra will give the massively over powered Benz a run for there money ! just to be clear im talking about the CL65 here ! To clarify my point further,lets compare a SL55 and a SL65, on a track, Braking, acceleration, handling, time,...... Almost the same, but the 65 has a ton and a hlf more Torque, 100 more HP , 1 more Kompressor (Twin Turbo Vs. Kompressor) 4 more cylinders, and costs a boat load of cash over the 55 ! WHY, for WHAT ? I would rather buy a Lamborghini, a Ferrari, or a Bently for that sort of money, interms of anything those cars are ate a higher level, so whats the use of all that power in a Benz >? where is the performance handling/braking your talking about compared to those ???? Braking???? HOW BIG WERE THOSE brakes ???? 15.4 inches thats larger than the wheels of a MBZ 7 years ago ! and only a few feet shorter of a Mustang...... HUH ! 8 PISTON CALIPERS, some racing cars dont have that many ! ALL THAT FOR A FEW FEET ! In the end i would like to say that if i had to pick between the 2 id pick the Merc. But my oppinion is that if a car costs as much as a house, i wouldnt like the feeling of a car that costs less than a garage to rub dust on my face, even in a boring, like most real life situations would be, straight line ! THATS ALL.
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Ohh yeah i forgot to add something:
Dont get me wrong I like Mercs, and the way they drive. You say 95% less roll, well its all relevant to what that percentage is compared to ! 95 % stiffer than a sloppy ride will be a decent ride not a Lemans racer ! I drove the Airmatic DC E55 Kompressor. Its nicer than the old MBZ's but not as good as the E39 M5 to drive ! But i would still take the Airmatic because its also AMAZINGLY supple over all road surfaces where the M5 is not, and thats where most of the driving is going to happen! I would also take any AMG55 over any AMG65 for better value and performance per $ (and the V-8 sound) In terms of bang for buck, you cant beat good old American Large Displacement V8's !
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Dude, a few feet shorter. Yes a few feet shorter, Did I mention 800lbs+ heavier than the Cobra?! Any way you look at it, that's a significant amount of weight. Still stops shorter. It needs brakes that big, shit, it weighs more than 4400lbs! Anyway, since were not really arguing, let's wait until MT or C&D test both cars on some track or what not, then we can bicker amongst ourselves, lol. I agree with you about the V-8s though, nothing like the sound of a Z06 running past you at full throttle!
__________________
The FASTLANE is for FAST CARS, damnit!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
How did I miss this thread
.
__________________
I Love The Lord Jesus. Romans 3:23 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," Romans 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 5:8 "But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 10:9 "That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
WOW 4400 Lbs thats SUV territory ! Overbuilt, Overpowered, understated, sounds good to me ![]()
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
KEEP IT UP
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I Love The Lord Jesus. Romans 3:23 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God," Romans 6:23 "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 5:8 "But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 10:9 "That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
Quote:
so lets say Mach70 keeps it up for ...mmmmmm.. 9 more months?, that would mean 2500+posts ! Shaggy has been a member for 10 months and your post count is ???? ohh thats why you think post count means shit ! J/K, i know, its the content quality of the post not the quantity that counts !
__________________
Horsepower is directly proportional to TORQUE X RPM. TORQUE is directly proportional to DISPLACEMENT. Therefore THERE'S NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|