Mazda 1.3 turbo

[Road-Runner]

click here

[Blackmilk]

Incredible

[FRESH_AZ]

Holly shit what the hell!!!! With power like that who needs switches

[thrillz]

its the fact that the wheel base is so short and the cars so light... could probably do that with a weedwacker motor..

[JUMUNGUS]

HAHA...did you say "weedwacker"??!! LOL Stop it!!

I straight up thought that car was an RC for a minute it's so small. I bet it'll eat you up like cereal tho.

[r34drifter]

I guess it's ok, i have better videos from frullboost.com. most cars there are turbo charged, just a few blown

[Road-Runner]

Originally Posted by r34drifter

I guess it's ok, i have better videos from frullboost.com. most cars there are turbo charged, just a few blown

I know,I know but stil it's a cool vid, is't it?

[NoHook]

He really needs to work out his chasis and get some willy bars and BTW it isn't 1.3 liters

[Blackmilk]

Originally Posted by NoHook

He really needs to work out his chasis and get some willy bars and BTW it isn't 1.3 liters

Yeah, you think at RX7 engine

[madrx7racer]

Originally Posted by NoHook

He really needs to work out his chasis and get some willy bars and BTW it isn't 1.3 liters

yes it is....13B=1.3 liters or 1308cc's

[NoHook]

Originally Posted by madrx7racer

yes it is....13B=1.3 liters or 1308cc's

No it isn't . If it is a 2 rotor it is 2.6 liters and a 3 rotor is 3.9 liters. This has been covered in a nother post and I came out right. They rate it 1.3 liters because only one rotory is operating at a time and that space in that rotary is 1.3 liters but if you combine the liter size of both rotaries, guess what !! 2.6 liters. We dont say a 5.0 liter motor is only 2.5 liters because only half of the pistons are firing at once . Why do you think they call the 2 rotor and the 3 rotor both 1.3 liters. The way they figure their math is messed up and it is a 2.6 liter when a 2 rotor and a 3.9 liter when it is a 3 rotor no matter what they "rate" it at. Why do you think the 3 rotor cars have to race in the 4 liter classes?

[rotarysmychoice]

Originally Posted by NoHook

No it isn't . If it is a 2 rotor it is 2.6 liters and a 3 rotor is 3.9 liters. This has been covered in a nother post and I came out right. They rate it 1.3 liters because only one rotory is operating at a time and that space in that rotary is 1.3 liters but if you combine the liter size of both rotaries, guess what !! 2.6 liters. We dont say a 5.0 liter motor is only 2.5 liters because only half of the pistons are firing at once . Why do you think they call the 2 rotor and the 3 rotor both 1.3 liters. The way they figure their math is messed up and it is a 2.6 liter when a 2 rotor and a 3.9 liter when it is a 3 rotor no matter what they "rate" it at. Why do you think the 3 rotor cars have to race in the 4 liter classes?

Well thats odd, because in my RX-7 book it is clearly stated and i copied it off-line:Engine Watercooled 2 rotors
turbocharged engine with intercooler
Displacement (cc) 654cc X 2
Horsepower (PS/rpm) 185/6500 205 /6500
Torque (kgm/rpm) 25.0/5000 27.5 / 5000

By that 654cc X 2 i would think that it means 654 per rotor and by 2 it would be 1308. Hence the name 13b for a 1.3 liter or 1308cc. Also, the 2 rotor and 3 rotor are not called the same thing, a two rotor is a 13b for 1308 ccs and a 3 rotor is a 20b for 1308 plus a nother 654 for the added rotor coming out to 1963. and the four rotor is a 26b using the same mathematic platform. {{{FLEX}}} Thank you.

[311unity13b]

its amazing how well a sports car can perform without having to lug around cams, pistons, and valves

[311unity13b]

Originally Posted by NoHook

No it isn't . If it is a 2 rotor it is 2.6 liters and a 3 rotor is 3.9 liters. This has been covered in a nother post and I came out right. They rate it 1.3 liters because only one rotory is operating at a time and that space in that rotary is 1.3 liters but if you combine the liter size of both rotaries, guess what !! 2.6 liters. We dont say a 5.0 liter motor is only 2.5 liters because only half of the pistons are firing at once . Why do you think they call the 2 rotor and the 3 rotor both 1.3 liters. The way they figure their math is messed up and it is a 2.6 liter when a 2 rotor and a 3.9 liter when it is a 3 rotor no matter what they "rate" it at. Why do you think the 3 rotor cars have to race in the 4 liter classes?

you, my friend, are WRONG, my 1.3 liter 13B is a 2-rotor, the 12A in the 1st gens are 1.2 liters, and are 2 rotors, the 20B is 2.0 liters and is 3 rotors....who the hell told you this? and in all motors, regardless of pistons or rotors, the liters is the internal VOLUME of the combustion chambers or housings......i'll bet u drive a Civic

[NJGreenBudd]

My '88 non-turbo rx7 came with the same 13B that every other one did from '86-'93, yes they are 1.3l, 1308cc to be exact. My car stock produces apprx 155 hp, doing the math we see that 155hp/1.3l= 119hp per liter. At that rate your 5.0 should have about 596 hp. The Wankel Rotary engine are veri fine examples of German engineering and don't you forget it. Weed wacker engine????? Bet you they both drive civics.......