2005 Supercharged RSX-S hits the dyno...

[jasmos]

2005 Supercharged RSX-S hits the dyno...

http://www.stevensrsx.com/Files/CTSC.avi

http://www.stevensrsx.com/Files/run.avi

[yota_fst]

didnt work for me sorry homes

[JGT8229]

worked for me :thumpup:

[jinlee]

what a waste of money on a supercharger.... only 283.... gay. :mecry: :mecry: should of got himself a turrrrrba :thumpup:

[RabidPony]

283whp, which would 340 crank hp. Thats 140hp over stock with no waiting for boost. Over a %50 gain sounds pretty good if you ask me.

[jinlee]

Originally Posted by RabidPony

283whp, which would 340 crank hp. Thats 140hp over stock with no waiting for boost. Over a %50 gain sounds pretty good if you ask me.

340 crank hp isn't going to be pushing you toward the 1/4. if i look at a car i want to see what it makes to the ground not to the crank. to me it's a waste of time. you'd easily be crankin almost or prolly 400 hp with a turbo on stock (depending the size turbo) superchared rsx-s aka waste of time and waste of money. turboed rsx-s vs a supercharged rsx-s the turboed rsx-s would smoke it easily. to me you get more out of a turbo on a 4 cylinder then you would a supercharger.

[JGT8229]

yes but he mite having ben thinking about other things like relibilty, there better for autoxing, u got boost right when u push the gas peddel. i think 260 is pretty good for a supercharged honda engine. there is more things to a car than just horsepower :thumb:

[ford_racer]

fer shizzle v-dubizzle

[jinlee]

Originally Posted by rydinturbo

yes but he mite having ben thinking about other things like relibilty, there better for autoxing, u got boost right when u push the gas peddel. i think 260 is pretty good for a supercharged honda engine. there is more things to a car than just horsepower :thumb:

yeah i guess.

[RabidPony]

Also what I am tryin to say is the 200hp rating from the factory is a crank hp number. And I agree you will get more out of a turbo, not just on a 4cyl but any engine. But its more street friendly. And also as was said still better for auto-x.

Also what do u mean 340 isnt gonna be pushing you towards the 1/4? If you mean its gonna be slow in the 1/4 mile thats not completely true. Yea turbo would prolly be faster but that car is still gonna be at least mid low 13's. Not bad at all for a nice and streetable 4 banger.

[jinlee]

Originally Posted by RabidPony

Also what I am tryin to say is the 200hp rating from the factory is a crank hp number. And I agree you will get more out of a turbo, not just on a 4cyl but any engine. But its more street friendly. And also as was said still better for auto-x.

Also what do u mean 340 isnt gonna be pushing you towards the 1/4? If you mean its gonna be slow in the 1/4 mile thats not completely true. Yea turbo would prolly be faster but that car is still gonna be at least mid low 13's. Not bad at all for a nice and streetable 4 banger.

nah he'll hit mid 14's with that power. turbo can be reliable also if you don't go crazy wit boost. i still think 283 isn't impressive. yeah there's more to a car then HP like torque would be awesome but our cars lack that. now 240 hp N/A now that's impressive for a 4 banger (k24 hybrid) it would prolly even smoke the supercharged k20a2. but if a supercharger makes the guy happy have at it.

[JGT8229]

Originally Posted by jinlee

nah he'll hit mid 14's with that power. turbo can be reliable also if you don't go crazy wit boost. i still think 283 isn't impressive. yeah there's more to a car then HP like torque would be awesome but our cars lack that. now 240 hp N/A now that's impressive for a 4 banger (k24 hybrid) it would prolly even smoke the supercharged k20a2. but if a supercharger makes the guy happy have at it.

hm dude thats ganna be way faster than mid 14s

[RabidPony]

Most deffinately. I bet a RSX-S with intake, header, cat-back and a few other bolt ons like maybe cam gears and lightened pulleys or somethin would be mid 14's or close.

[jinlee]

Originally Posted by RabidPony

Most deffinately. I bet a RSX-S with intake, header, cat-back and a few other bolt ons like maybe cam gears and lightened pulleys or somethin would be mid 14's or close.

high 14's with I/H catback

stock they run mid 15's

but a supercharged rsx-s with 283 hp would run low 14's maybe high 13's but that's what i think. could run mid 13's but i don't know never had a supercharged rsx-s. i just have a rsx-s.

[95bat]

A company called Rotrex actually makes a supercharger that is more efficient than a turbocharger without the turbo lag.

So efficient you hardly need an intercooler at all, we're talking over 80% efficiency.