![]() |
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Dedicated Tremekian
|
very nice. Also havea look in Car pictures for the same thread
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, BUT rather to skid in sideways, thoroughly used, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming... "HELL YEAH, WHAT A TRIP" http://www.drakephotography.com.au |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
LuCiFeR
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: hanging eddy wu from a tree and beating him
Posts: 11,955
|
i still think it is a failure from gm, i don't recall camaros in 67 68 69 having round tail lights for one and the rear end looks to much like a vette. gone are the very distinct body lines of the 69 that this car was cosmeticly based on, sure they might be there in a very faint none existant way as some might argue but all in all i feel it is a failure. and i'm not the only one to think that.
__________________
1st MEMBER OF THE KEEP IT TO THE STREETS FOUNDATION. ![]() go fuk yourself rams, my sig was just fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Tremekian
|
It also has an almost vette like ram-air. The exterior is bearable but the interior is ungodly ugly.. almost made me puke. The one thing that should be nice on a car (especially a new car since your going to buy exactly what you want) is the interior since thats where you will be spending almost all of your time.
__________________
Injection is nice, but I'd rather be blown. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|