Tremek Car Video Forum

JGT8229 · 25 Jul 2007, 11:09 pm

5.0
my friends stang at the track, he can get some beter times, first time racing at the track. also need some new tires in the rear, he had slicks but his friend destroied them lol burnouts
i got like 27 minute of other footage from the track, i am gona edited it tomorow.
there will be alot faster cars dont worry lol
5.0

Ford88 · 25 Jul 2007, 11:49 pm

nice video was that the 1/8th? was that a 9.5 my friend ran a 9.43 with the worlds shittiest clutch(tried myself) and he only has exhaust

97talon · 26 Jul 2007, 01:27 am

Looked like an 1/8 track. Shitty quality video

.

UKunt · 26 Jul 2007, 02:27 am

it couldnt of been a 1/8 as it was running 15.5 times

JGT8229 · 26 Jul 2007, 07:42 am

no it was a 1/4
and the qualty of the video was exilent, until i uploaded it. it ****ed the quialty up. idk why stupid google video

UKunt · 26 Jul 2007, 08:26 am

was it all stock??? also what was his best time?

JGT8229 · 26 Jul 2007, 10:24 am

he got 3.55 gears, full exhaust, intake, new ingtion wire, dizzy, got susption , shocks, struts springs. some other stuf. he should be running low 14s, high 13s wid sticky tires, and 4.10 gears. he has some crap tires on the rear, and that was his first time at the track. he will have new times in alike a week, proly get low 14s. o yea its stripped to

UKunt · 26 Jul 2007, 10:37 am

yer thats a weak time to get with all that lot.i thought they was 14 sec cars stock.it that a 225bhp engine??

JGT8229 · 26 Jul 2007, 10:46 am

yes it is, but as i said thats his first time at the track. 14.6 isnt bad , he doesnt have that many engine mods, only basic stuff. the reson why his time was so high the second time is cuz he went through the waterbox. ide say he could bring his time downm to high 13's low 14s. he almost beat that eclsipe that had way more mods, everything twas ported and polished, turbo intercooler, alot more mods, with a beter lauch he would habe took him.

UKunt · 26 Jul 2007, 10:54 am

AHH i only see it say 15.xx. 14.6 isnt a bad time i guess.

JGT8229 · 26 Jul 2007, 10:57 am

there was civcs there with so much work into them running 15s and 16s, both races he had where close, he had less mods than both people he versed

UKunt · 26 Jul 2007, 10:58 am

how many runs did he have????

JGT8229 · 31 Jul 2007, 02:02 pm

editing the other footage now, anyone know where i can upload it where it wont mess up the quaility ? thanks

UKunt · 31 Jul 2007, 02:08 pm

Stage6 · Upload Video Clips. Share, Watch, Download Videos

it should keep the same quality on there..

DriftingRz · 03 Aug 2007, 08:59 pm

well the 93 stangs were only like 200bhp, because the cylinder heads were different

25 Jul 2007, 11:09 pm	#1 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	5.0 stang 5.0 my friends stang at the track, he can get some beter times, first time racing at the track. also need some new tires in the rear, he had slicks but his friend destroied them lol burnouts i got like 27 minute of other footage from the track, i am gona edited it tomorow. there will be alot faster cars dont worry lol 5.0 __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

25 Jul 2007, 11:49 pm	#2 (permalink)
Ford88 Sticking it to the man!!! Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 4,609 Ford88's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang nice video was that the 1/8th? was that a 9.5 my friend ran a 9.43 with the worlds shittiest clutch(tried myself) and he only has exhaust

26 Jul 2007, 01:27 am	#3 (permalink)
97talon VIPER>ZR1 Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Laconia NH Posts: 22,577 97talon's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang Looked like an 1/8 track. Shitty quality video .

26 Jul 2007, 07:42 am	#5 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang no it was a 1/4 and the qualty of the video was exilent, until i uploaded it. it ****ed the quialty up. idk why stupid google video __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

26 Jul 2007, 10:24 am	#7 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang he got 3.55 gears, full exhaust, intake, new ingtion wire, dizzy, got susption , shocks, struts springs. some other stuf. he should be running low 14s, high 13s wid sticky tires, and 4.10 gears. he has some crap tires on the rear, and that was his first time at the track. he will have new times in alike a week, proly get low 14s. o yea its stripped to __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

26 Jul 2007, 10:46 am	#9 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang yes it is, but as i said thats his first time at the track. 14.6 isnt bad , he doesnt have that many engine mods, only basic stuff. the reson why his time was so high the second time is cuz he went through the waterbox. ide say he could bring his time downm to high 13's low 14s. he almost beat that eclsipe that had way more mods, everything twas ported and polished, turbo intercooler, alot more mods, with a beter lauch he would habe took him. __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

26 Jul 2007, 10:57 am	#11 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang there was civcs there with so much work into them running 15s and 16s, both races he had where close, he had less mods than both people he versed __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

31 Jul 2007, 02:02 pm	#13 (permalink)
JGT8229 Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: your mom Posts: 10,888 JGT8229's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang editing the other footage now, anyone know where i can upload it where it wont mess up the quaility ? thanks __________________ http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/lo...6c56a403b.html

03 Aug 2007, 08:59 pm	#15 (permalink)
DriftingRz Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Gone Fishin' Posts: 9,803 DriftingRz's Gallery	Re: 5.0 stang well the 93 stangs were only like 200bhp, because the cylinder heads were different

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Timing for my stang.	nickaliss	Performance Modifications	4	18 Dec 2006 06:48 pm