![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Photo Gallery | Parts Search |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Fresh Noob
|
me and my dad went to farmington about 1 week ago and we ran 9.2.the only thing done to it is exzaust,cold air and x-pipe.and we dynowed two days after and got 249hp out of it.is that good or not
Last edited by johnsj; 14 Jun 2006 at 09:04 pm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Regular Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Obsessed Tremekian
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Put'n my giggity in Burghs moms cornhole
Posts: 7,473
|
according to your dyno sheet, those numbers are NOT s.a.e. corrected, otherwise it would say it along the side or the bottom of the sheet. So, in reality, your looking at about 230RWHP = weeksauce. Builing up a 2V 4.6L SOHC motor is like burning your money. bolt-ons aint gunna net you shit for power increases, and a blower on a SOHC motor will make some power, and your internals aint gunna last, but I have smoked a full bolt-on, SC'ed 2004 stang GT when all I had was bolt-ons, he had 4.30 gears and drag radials also....best $50 bucks I ever made!!!
good luck to ya, cars looks good.
__________________
I own the brits, and I'll sell you one for $20. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|