Chrysler 300C SVT-8

[Verrückt]

Originally Posted by nx468

The 300c are pretty good looking cars, so is the GXP. But personally if I wanted a highway crusier and that had some gitty up. I would buy a slightly used 03 SSEI Bonneville , slap the pulley on it , cold air, and chip (seen a Regal and GTP have this setup they ran low 12s allday FWD). Save ALL kinds of money and make the 300c look stupid in any race. But that would be my personal choice for a highway car. This arent freaking sport cars ! cmon now.

Hate to break it to you but it takes A LOT more than a pulley, intake, and chip to run low 12's with those cars. You'd be lucky to run low 13's. Maybe that's what you meant.

[Zenkat]

lol, the GTP would need intake/heads/exhaust/pulley/chip to hit mid 13's, and then you need to rebuild your failing tranny.

I think the Bonneville SSEI had a far nicer looking front end than the GXP has, but the 300c just owns the bonneville in every department, hands down. My family has had 4 bonnevilles (94, 97, 00, 02), all SSEI, and i loved them all. I'd still much rather have a 300.

And as for that SL65..... keep the rags handy, i'd lose bodily control within 20 feet of that car......

[nx468]

Originally Posted by Verrückt

Hate to break it to you but it takes A LOT more than a pulley, intake, and chip to run low 12's with those cars. You'd be lucky to run low 13's. Maybe that's what you meant.

Originally Posted by Zenkat

lol, the GTP would need intake/heads/exhaust/pulley/chip to hit mid 13's, and then you need to rebuild your failing tranny.

I think the Bonneville SSEI had a far nicer looking front end than the GXP has, but the 300c just owns the bonneville in every department, hands down. My family has had 4 bonnevilles (94, 97, 00, 02), all SSEI, and i loved them all. I'd still much rather have a 300.

And as for that SL65..... keep the rags handy, i'd lose bodily control within 20 feet of that car......

Oh really http://www.westcoast6s.com/MyVideos/Regal%20Vid.wmv
Hmmm low 12s eh ?
Heres the thread on this forum too Buick Regal

There ya go boys !! Now what was you 2 saying ?

[Verrückt]

Originally Posted by nx468

Oh really http://www.westcoast6s.com/MyVideos/Regal%20Vid.wmv
Hmmm low 12s eh ?
Heres the thread on this forum too Buick Regal

There ya go boys !! Now what was you 2 saying ?

What was I saying? Oh yeah, I was saying you suck at the reading comprehension. He runs a 13.2 and has a whole lot more mods than pulley, intake, and chip.

Notice an Fbody running 11.8 absolutely rips him a new *******. That car is a solid 13 second ride, not that fast. Where are you getting the low 12's from?

[Joe SS]

The GTO on the outside is a Holden, that is true, but it still is a LS2 with a 6 speed, that drivetrain was strait out of the chevy playbook. In this case is would take the 300c though way before the pontiac, not because the pontiac sucks, just cause the 300C in my opinion is much better.
Too bad the general does not give the option for a LS2 and 6 speed and RWD in all there cars.
Both are nice cars but the 300c is just better looking to me and is RWD, thats just is enough to put it above the pontiac. But ill take the GTO before ill take the 300c

[nx468]

Originally Posted by Verrückt

What was I saying? Oh yeah, I was saying you suck at the reading comprehension. He runs a 13.2 and has a whole lot more mods than pulley, intake, and chip.

Notice an Fbody running 11.8 absolutely rips him a new *******. That car is a solid 13 second ride, not that fast. Where are you getting the low 12's from?

Actually if you read the guys post, he was having coolant dumping into his intake, he corrected this problem, and has new times on that car. He also has a buddy listed here http://www.westcoast6s.com/times.htm in a GTP that has the same setup as him and runs in the 12s ,If you also look at his reaction time and count the tenths that car is in the 12s. So if Ive seen it done in my area and out in their area , what more proof do you need ? And Im sorry but 2k in mods in normal bolt ons for stock motor
And your absolutely right 12s isnt fast, but at least it would be a nice highway car with a lil gitty up for cheap.

Originally Posted by deanh8

3.0" Supercharger Pulley $60 bucks
MSP Cold Air Intake $80 bucks on ebay
SLP 1.8 Rockers $399
TOG Headers $700 + $300 Discount
Ported and Polished Special Edition LS1 Throttle Body $400
High Performance LS1 Fuel Pump $80
Custom DHP PCM (computer) $30
Mini AFC 2.0 Free
High Flow Cat $200 w/ 3” Downpipe
2.5" exhaust all the way back $100
U-bend and Res. Delete Included With Exhaust Above
MSD Coils $80 bucks ebay
MSD Race Wires $110
Optima Yellow Top Battery $80
Polly Motor Mounts $50
Special Edition LS1 Throttle Body Spacer Came With LS1 Throttle Body
Valve Cover Breather Came With LS1 Throttle Body
SLP Strut Tower Brace $80 Ebay
GMPP Struts and Springs $800
GMPP Police Suspension Package $110
GMPP Lowering Kit
Nitto 555r Drag Radials
Blown Throttle Body Gasket Which Flooded The Engine With Coolant



$1899 - In "Go Faster" Mods

$3159 - With Suspension Stuff And Non-Go Fast Stuff

[Verrückt]

Originally Posted by nx468

Actually if you read the guys post, he was having coolant dumping into his intake, he corrected this problem, and has new times on that car. He also has a buddy listed here http://www.westcoast6s.com/times.htm in a GTP that has the same setup as him and runs in the 12s ,If you also look at his reaction time and count the tenths that car is in the 12s. So if Ive seen it done in my area and out in their area , what more proof do you need ? And Im sorry but 2k in mods in normal bolt ons for stock motor
And your absolutely right 12s isnt fast, but at least it would be a nice highway car with a lil gitty up for cheap.

Hey n00b. Reaction time doesn't change ET at all.

[nx468]

Hey dumbass !! Ive dragged raced for 15 years in classes such as Super Pro , Pro Gas , Real Street , and now 10.5w Outlaw. Reaction time does counts tenths you ****ing moron !! Dont get pissy cause I showed you proof. .925 reaction time 4 tenths like a .525 light would come off his run. Stay on your toilet bowl racing shit. Dont see where Im a newbie at drag racing. I would love to see you tell Warren Johnson or Jeg Coughlin , reaction time doesnt count. They would laugh you off the track for being a moron.

Here something your probably use to besides magazines and other dumbshit before you open your mouth again.
http://www.hardcore50.com/members/reactiontimes.htm See where it says your ET improves when you cut a better light !! A Clock is a clock no matter how you see it.

[MandarinSolara]

[quote=mattlikespeople]no 300c vid here but i think the baddest luxury car is the sl65 QUOTE]

hey buddy are you sure thats not SL55?

[JohnnyWash1]

Originally Posted by nx468

Hey dumbass !! Ive dragged raced for 15 years in classes such as Super Pro , Pro Gas , Real Street , and now 10.5w Outlaw. Reaction time does counts tenths you ****ing moron !! Dont get pissy cause I showed you proof. .925 reaction time 4 tenths like a .525 light would come off his run. Stay on your toilet bowl racing shit. Dont see where Im a newbie at drag racing. I would love to see you tell Warren Johnson or Jeg Coughlin , reaction time doesnt count. They would laugh you off the track for being a moron.

Here something your probably use to besides magazines and other dumbshit before you open your mouth again.
http://www.hardcore50.com/members/reactiontimes.htm See where it says your ET improves when you cut a better light !! A Clock is a clock no matter how you see it.

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. The actual reaction time (i.e. .945 or so) would not affect the E.T. If you get a better reaction, however, you may come out of the hole faster and achieve a better E.T. The fact is, you could sit at the light for 5 minutes, launch, and still get the same time as if you launched immediately. Timing for the E.T. doesn't start until after the reaction.

[Ramsie]

Originally Posted by JohnnyWash1

I'm sorry, but you are wrong. The actual reaction time (i.e. .945 or so) would not affect the E.T. If you get a better reaction, however, you may come out of the hole faster and achieve a better E.T. The fact is, you could sit at the light for 5 minutes, launch, and still get the same time as if you launched immediately. Timing for the E.T. doesn't start until after the reaction.

Reaction times do count depending on the conditions your racing under...
ET + RT, its what the pros go by, and if you dail-in...

[nx468]

When you shallow stage (ie:just barely light the stage light) your ET will improve because you get more of a rolling start before you break the starting beam. Conversely, when you deep stage your ET will slow down because you are closer to the starting line and get less of a rolling start before breaking the starting beam.So theres many factors on how he can make up tenths lost. The most important would be 60ft. in ET. Yes the clock starts when you leave the lense, but you dont know if he was deep staged or what. So I was just showing Verruckt where this car can and will run 12s. I showed him the proof evidently he is not satisfied.

[mattlikespeople]

[quote=MandarinSolara][quote=mattlikespeople]no 300c vid here but i think the baddest luxury car is the sl65

hey buddy are you sure thats not SL55?

no, not sure but thats a pic that came up from a google seard of 'sl65'

[JohnnyWash1]

Originally Posted by nx468

When you shallow stage (ie:just barely light the stage light) your ET will improve because you get more of a rolling start before you break the starting beam. Conversely, when you deep stage your ET will slow down because you are closer to the starting line and get less of a rolling start before breaking the starting beam.So theres many factors on how he can make up tenths lost. The most important would be 60ft. in ET. Yes the clock starts when you leave the lense, but you dont know if he was deep staged or what. So I was just showing Verruckt where this car can and will run 12s. I showed him the proof evidently he is not satisfied.

Isn't it the other way around? Shallow stage will not give a good "rolling start" and deep staging will?

[Verrückt]

Originally Posted by JohnnyWash1

Isn't it the other way around? Shallow stage will not give a good "rolling start" and deep staging will?

No, he's right on that.

Originally Posted by nx468

When you shallow stage (ie:just barely light the stage light) your ET will improve because you get more of a rolling start before you break the starting beam. Conversely, when you deep stage your ET will slow down because you are closer to the starting line and get less of a rolling start before breaking the starting beam.So theres many factors on how he can make up tenths lost. The most important would be 60ft. in ET. Yes the clock starts when you leave the lense, but you dont know if he was deep staged or what. So I was just showing Verruckt where this car can and will run 12s. I showed him the proof evidently he is not satisfied.

You keep changing your story bud.

First you go with...

slap the pulley on it , cold air, and chip (seen a Regal and GTP have this setup they ran low 12s allday FWD)

Then you try to prove me wrong by presenting a Regal with MORE modifications than that and has run a best of 13.2. Something doesn't add up.

Without even knowing that Regal's best time I suggested you meant low 13's. Guess what, I was right. I don't care what he "should" have run.

Show me a GTP or Regal running low 12's all day long with only those 3 items you mentioned. Go ahead. That's all you have to do and I'll shut up and admit I was wrong.

Then you claim that...

.925 reaction time 4 tenths like a .525 light would come off his run.

Bullshit. Going from a .925 light to a .525 light will NOT take 4 tenths off his run. You making a claim like that casts some serious doubts to any credibility you have on drag racing.

You then go into staging which of course can have an effect on ET, but we are not and have not been talking about that. You have no idea how he staged and neither do I so it's a useless argument for you.