Tremek Car Video Forum

GusGus · 05 Dec 2004, 05:33 pm

http://www.radford.edu/~jseemuell/neons.wmv

Mustangs Rock!

OCG · 05 Dec 2004, 05:53 pm

umm since iam a srt-4 fan i wont say nothing

American Psycho · 05 Dec 2004, 06:04 pm

as long as it fast i dont care what it is

But I still like mustangs more

r34drifter · 05 Dec 2004, 06:17 pm

Nice video, i wanted some proff of my beliefs, Srt-4 is fast, but it's like buying a recycleable car.

///brian · 05 Dec 2004, 06:58 pm

as long as its fwd it is useless

dragracingdemon · 06 Dec 2004, 08:57 am

I never realy liked the Srt-4 Neons. I looked at one and you say wow a 4 door, front wheel drive, turbo neon. Yea 13's stock in cool (considering that the '05 Mustang GT (automatic) runs 14's) but I just don't know if they can handle regular abuse, and how reliable the motors are gonna be (the 2.0L and 2.4L seem to have been having problems with head gaskets sense '95). But I never drove one, and never worked on a neon (except my friends '93 sport), not the best car to race but it was quick for a 2 door, 4 banger with a 5 speed). Although my '92 Escort GT kept up with him (lost by 2.5 cars length).

GusGus · 06 Dec 2004, 09:49 am

Note: 2005 GT 5spd running 13.4's auto should be 14.1

dragracingdemon · 06 Dec 2004, 10:38 am

Popular Hot Rod mag. reported a 14.19 @ 96.6 mph with the '05 Stang GT with the 5-speed auto.

Orbitronio · 06 Dec 2004, 11:15 am

All of you are stupid fighting over a few tenth of a second. How about judjing the cars perfomance not by a straight line but on a real track? That's where mustangs without heavy tuning suck.

It's all about the engine design, can't say that all 2.0 and 2.4 have problems.

FuSiOn86 · 06 Dec 2004, 11:30 am

haterz...... All i got to say....... That's a vids bs. made for ford luverz

Screw Ford!

American Psycho · 06 Dec 2004, 12:27 pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orbitronio

All of you are stupid fighting over a few tenth of a second. How about judjing the cars perfomance not by a straight line but on a real track? That's where mustangs without heavy tuning suck.

It's all about the engine design, can't say that all 2.0 and 2.4 have problems.

Look at the 99+ Cobras, they are built for road courses etc. not for the straight line. there goes your thoery

RiceEaterRT · 06 Dec 2004, 01:08 pm

Pretty lame when Mustang lovers have to brag about being able to beat a neon, that is almost as fast for a lot less. A couple Mopar performance parts and the Mustang is dust. In addition that video had that yellow neon blowing up, if i remember correctly that particulat car was boosted to hell on all stock internal as they were pushing it to see how for they could go with the stock internals.

American Psycho · 06 Dec 2004, 01:20 pm

WHO GIVES A ****

If you buy into that bullshit about ALL us mustang owners thinking that.

The video is being streotypical.

new_formula_S2K · 06 Dec 2004, 01:26 pm

yea the srt is a fine car...

who cares about 10ths of a second that means nothing.. what does mean something is on the track, which mustangs arent as good as srts. My car is notthat good on the strip (about 14 seconds) but the S2000 could blow away a srt or a mustang on the track.

jblood · 06 Dec 2004, 02:21 pm

i dont think so. s2000's are great and all, but it wont beat a srt4 or a mustang gt. s2k's do like lower mid 14's stock. they are made for handling. the s2k has no more than 240 hp dynoed and less than 150 lb ft of toque stock. a gt has nearly 300 or more lb ft of torque, thats more than 2 times as much as a s2k.

05 Dec 2004, 06:04 pm	#3 (permalink)
American Psycho New Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Jupiter Posts: 12,125 American Psycho's Gallery	as long as it fast i dont care what it is But I still like mustangs more __________________

06 Dec 2004, 08:57 am	#6 (permalink)
dragracingdemon Cool Tremekian Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Cambria, WI Posts: 269 dragracingdemon's Gallery	I never realy liked the Srt-4 Neons. I looked at one and you say wow a 4 door, front wheel drive, turbo neon. Yea 13's stock in cool (considering that the '05 Mustang GT (automatic) runs 14's) but I just don't know if they can handle regular abuse, and how reliable the motors are gonna be (the 2.0L and 2.4L seem to have been having problems with head gaskets sense '95). But I never drove one, and never worked on a neon (except my friends '93 sport), not the best car to race but it was quick for a 2 door, 4 banger with a 5 speed). Although my '92 Escort GT kept up with him (lost by 2.5 cars length). __________________ 1974 Chevy Nova Custom (for sale) 5.7L 350 c.i.d. V8 w/4-speed man. and 3:90:1 gears Too many mods to list 1999 Silverado Z71 5.3L 325 c.i.d. V8 w/4-speed auto and 3:42:1 gears Flowmaster Force II 3 in. cat-back exhaust, JBA 9mm Power Cable spark plug wires, Hypertech 160 degree thermostat Best 1/4 mile = 16.727@81.51 (Stock) 4332 pounds, 290 - 310 hp and 351 - 361 ft.lbs. Reon Kadena & Yoko Matsugane = Perfect 10!! Streetfire.com and all that link to it can eat my *ss!!

06 Dec 2004, 10:38 am	#8 (permalink)
dragracingdemon Cool Tremekian Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Cambria, WI Posts: 269 dragracingdemon's Gallery	Popular Hot Rod mag. reported a 14.19 @ 96.6 mph with the '05 Stang GT with the 5-speed auto. __________________ 1974 Chevy Nova Custom (for sale) 5.7L 350 c.i.d. V8 w/4-speed man. and 3:90:1 gears Too many mods to list 1999 Silverado Z71 5.3L 325 c.i.d. V8 w/4-speed auto and 3:42:1 gears Flowmaster Force II 3 in. cat-back exhaust, JBA 9mm Power Cable spark plug wires, Hypertech 160 degree thermostat Best 1/4 mile = 16.727@81.51 (Stock) 4332 pounds, 290 - 310 hp and 351 - 361 ft.lbs. Reon Kadena & Yoko Matsugane = Perfect 10!! Streetfire.com and all that link to it can eat my *ss!!

06 Dec 2004, 01:20 pm	#13 (permalink)
American Psycho New Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Jupiter Posts: 12,125 American Psycho's Gallery	WHO GIVES A **** If you buy into that bullshit about ALL us mustang owners thinking that. The video is being streotypical. __________________ Last edited by American Psycho; 06 Dec 2004 at 01:32 pm.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05 Dec 2004, 05:53 pm	#2 (permalink)
OCG Fanatic Tremekian Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Orlando FL ( A.K.A. Rice Town) Posts: 637 OCG's Gallery	umm since iam a srt-4 fan i wont say nothing

05 Dec 2004, 06:17 pm	#4 (permalink)
r34drifter Obsessed Tremekian Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: California Posts: 5,104 r34drifter's Gallery	Nice video, i wanted some proff of my beliefs, Srt-4 is fast, but it's like buying a recycleable car.

05 Dec 2004, 06:58 pm	#5 (permalink)
///brian Fresh Noob Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Hawaii Posts: 1 ///brian's Gallery	as long as its fwd it is useless

06 Dec 2004, 11:15 am	#9 (permalink)
Orbitronio Young Noob Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 80 Orbitronio's Gallery	All of you are stupid fighting over a few tenth of a second. How about judjing the cars perfomance not by a straight line but on a real track? That's where mustangs without heavy tuning suck. It's all about the engine design, can't say that all 2.0 and 2.4 have problems.

06 Dec 2004, 11:30 am	#10 (permalink)
FuSiOn86 Regular Tremekian Join Date: Sep 2004 Posts: 175 FuSiOn86's Gallery	haterz...... All i got to say....... That's a vids bs. made for ford luverz Screw Ford!

06 Dec 2004, 01:08 pm	#12 (permalink)
RiceEaterRT Fresh Noob Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 18 RiceEaterRT's Gallery	Pretty lame when Mustang lovers have to brag about being able to beat a neon, that is almost as fast for a lot less. A couple Mopar performance parts and the Mustang is dust. In addition that video had that yellow neon blowing up, if i remember correctly that particulat car was boosted to hell on all stock internal as they were pushing it to see how for they could go with the stock internals.

06 Dec 2004, 01:26 pm	#14 (permalink)
new_formula_S2K Senior Tremekian Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Sandwich, MA Posts: 1,344 new_formula_S2K's Gallery	yea the srt is a fine car... who cares about 10ths of a second that means nothing.. what does mean something is on the track, which mustangs arent as good as srts. My car is notthat good on the strip (about 14 seconds) but the S2000 could blow away a srt or a mustang on the track.

06 Dec 2004, 02:21 pm	#15 (permalink)
jblood Fresh Noob Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 2 jblood's Gallery	i dont think so. s2000's are great and all, but it wont beat a srt4 or a mustang gt. s2k's do like lower mid 14's stock. they are made for handling. the s2k has no more than 240 hp dynoed and less than 150 lb ft of toque stock. a gt has nearly 300 or more lb ft of torque, thats more than 2 times as much as a s2k.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)