The Truth About SRT4's

[JaPPster]

yea, but on d track, srt4& stang, don't stand a chance agains honda, trust me

[Verrückt]

Originally Posted by jblood

i dont think so. s2000's are great and all, but it wont beat a srt4 or a mustang gt. s2k's do like lower mid 14's stock. they are made for handling. the s2k has no more than 240 hp dynoed and less than 150 lb ft of toque stock. a gt has nearly 300 or more lb ft of torque, thats more than 2 times as much as a s2k.

He said "track", not dragstrip.

[dragracingdemon]

I was just posting the time cause I said generally so I just wanted to make it more specific. Driver skill factors into that (and any race). I don't really like the Srt-4 Neons but I like them as much as I do Mustangs. Every car has its strengths and weaknesses. You just have to know where they are. I have heard on a few forums of guys in Srt-4s saying that they have smoked GT Stangs stock, and with 3 or 4 simple bolt-ons that they would kill a Cobra from a roll. I know 7 people that have or had 95+ Neons some beat the crap out of them, other babied them all of them however have had to replace the head gasket and in most cases the head as well. That is why I say what I did.

[99civicsi]

link down?

[5.0L at a time]

I'd like to see this too, any other links?

[new_formula_S2K]

ok the mustang GT (previous versions) definetly has 260hp and 302 ft lbs. but still.. its listed 0-60 is 5.5 and the S2000's (2003 model) is 5.2 the mustangs listed 1/4 mile time is 14.1 about the same as an S2k. but thats not the point who buys a car to go in a straight line. the S2000 would destroy a GT on the auto x or any type of race course with some good turns.

[GusGus]

The 2002 GT Got an iincrease in TQ that helped them out in the 1/4

[Zenkat]

The video is just a bunch of jumbled together SRT video's, a lame attempt at belittling a decent car.

Someone is an obvious hater, and has too much free time.