![]() |
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Fresh Noob
|
Quote:
that other car to me looked like a civic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Regular Tremekian
|
Quote:
Think about Power to weight ratio.. First off, that equals them... Then take into fact that a AWD drivetrain has more parasitic loss then a 2WD drivetrain. I'd LOVE to see a STOCK EVO timeslip under 13.5 Second of all, a STOCK SRT-4 with a CAPABLE driver has already been proven to hit SUB 13.5 times. Last edited by Sick srt-4 : 20 Feb 2005 at 10:26 am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Young Noob
|
yeah and think of what u said F150 the srt has 100-101 mph in the quarter and the evo has 103-105 in the quarter dosent that tell u right there that the evo just has better take off cause its a 4 wheel drive? u dont make any since 21,000 for the srt or 28,000 for the evo and they are basicly the same speed stock to stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
I have to admit that srt-4's are pretty impressive. I was thinking about buying one before i set my mind on a Wrx. I went to test drive one, an 03 without LSD and it was CRAZY! man 21 thousand jus boggled my mind. still i would have to stick with a car without a body of a neon
__________________
2005 Aspen White WRX |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Fresh Noob
|
Quote:
Just the facts of life, move on. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|