![]() |
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Tremekian
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: insightful and tastfully immature
Posts: 4,515
|
Quote:
atleast throw on a supercharger or turbo for half a mil. Maybe it's not in US dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Dedicated Tremekian
|
Type: V6
Displacement cu in (cc): 194 (3179) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 280(206) / 7300 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 220(298) / 5300 Redline at RPM: n.a. My grandma station wagon has more torque than that ![]()
__________________
תּמּוּמּđזּéşş şéזּЂ וּמּđטּזּפּéמּבּé I MAY SEEM INVISIBLE, BUT IM STILL HERE TO ATTACK .. 3*3 OzAr3 + SSG + ParadoX = apok0lyps + Javaman + Pyr0 En Gozen Okeru Koigokoro Motte Ato Sutorippa
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Yet again, the F355 is almost 3 seconds faster then the NSX, but i dont wanna start another argument. Also one question, were did u find these cause they should be disregarded if the same driver was not used (only for consistancy reasons.) The times will obviously differ greatley if many people set those times, making them pretty much worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Dedicated Tremekian
|
??? the nsx-r is faster than the f355 by 9 seconds. anyways I got it from here:
Evo 9 prototype on Nurburgring |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|