![]() |
|
|||||||
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||
|
New Tremekian
|
Quote:
__________________
http://pornored.proboards61.com/index.cgi Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
absolut cool
|
Quote:
Second, 1964: Third, 1966: The exact years vs the models shown above is not correct. I just chose those pics for the angles shown. Before you may wanna argue more, I'll grant you the Pantera came 5 years later... My point is that the Pantera is more bold hence it's presence than the original Miura and that's what got my attention... the bold in the similarity. I'm sorry too if ya didn't mean it like you said it but it did sound like that... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Cool Tremekian
|
WoW!!
i LOVE IT!
__________________
![]() 1978 280Z Boring Mods : F54/P90a turbo engine, Holset HY35W turbo, 440cc injectors, full 3" open exhuast, Megasquirt EMS, Arizona Springs, Tokico 5ways, BIG sway bars www.putfile.com/proxlamus SEE my 280Z in ACTION! VIDEO! |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Regular Tremekian
|
mmmmm.. miura.... if you wanted to go faster in 1968 you needed to be with NASA.. and while i think it edges on blasphemy to modernize one of the most gorgeous cars ever, i like the look by itself, and i like the direction Lambo seems to be thinking of going..
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|