![]() |
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
I like it and the performance is there. But I was reading on the piston speed and its wayyyy past the reliable speeds in all the engineering books and classes that I took. I mean seriously the piston speed on that car when its past 6500rpms is just too great for long term reliability. Those piston rings and cylinder sleeves are going to need replacement in less than 50.000 miles.
Here's a simple chart that examples that. The Audi's piston speed is 25.7m/sec which in Ft/min is 5088ft/min. Mean Piston Speed Result ------------------ ------ Under 3,500 ft/min Good reliability 3,500-4,000 ft/min Stressful, needs good design Over 4,000 ft/min Very short life Draw your own conclusions on it. Nice car though! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
It's my personal opinion that the engine will have problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
At those speeds, I'd be concerned about the stability of the rings, the bearing loads, and the fatigue on the reciprocating parts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Clarkson was testing this on Top Gear last weekend and he couldn't say enough good things about it, and even went as far to say he thinks he was sitting behind one of the best engines ever made and even the new M3 will need to come with a free moon to be better :lol:
I'd certainly have 1 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Fanatic Tremekian
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|