View Single Post
Old 15 Jan 2007, 01:18 pm   #8 (permalink)
BOTLFEDLT1
Senior Tremekian
 
BOTLFEDLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,139
Default

Mustangs arent that bad, aero wise.. even the 1994 was 0.32 ... a ferrari f40 is 0.34 for comparison, a civic is 0.36. (this ignores frontal area and downforce benefit of wings (like in the case of the ferrari)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UKunt View Post
i would of thought mustangs would have bad aerodynamics.?ive not searched for it tho to see..
BOTLFEDLT1 is offline